Public transit bus converted into mobile lab for students

|  KTVB

MERIDIAN –Treasure Valley schools have a new mobile resource to help children learn science, technology and engineering.

The J.A. and Kathryn Albertson Foundation and Discover Technology unveiled the bus, known as  “Treasure Valley 1″ on Monday morning in Meridian.

What was once a public transit bus is now the newest tool in Discover’s fleet of STEM Mobile Discovery Labs.

It features 22 workstations and room for instructors.

“Our goal is to take student by student, put them in an experience where it’s just a spark that happens for them that I can build a robot, I can do C programming, I can do this,” said Cindy Esposito, Discover Technology.

Discover plans to take “Treasure Valley 1″ to schools across the valley over the next three days, starting Tuesday. {…}

Facebook Twitter Email Pinterest Plusone Linkedin Print

Wi-Fi on public transport faces access, monetization road bumps

Ellyne Phneah  |  ZDNet

More Asian markets are looking to introduce Wi-Fi on their transport systems given that it would improve commuter satisfaction and boost overall GDP growth. Service providers would have to contend with providing Wi-Fi access through areas with poor signals and whether to charge for the service, which would impact uptake of such services.

Naveen Misra, telecommunications principal analyst at Frost & Sullivan Asia-Pacific, said more countries here are starting to offer Wi-Fi services on public trains and buses to provide entertainment for commuters on long-haul trips and improve customer service, as well as boost the country’s GDP growth by enhancing mobile workers’ productivity.

Strong growth in mobile device adoption and rapidly developing IT infrastructure in the region will mean that more Asian cities will start offering similar Wi-Fi access, Misra added.

Already, China and Japan are two markets which have initiated such Wi-Fi projects. The Chinese government in 2012 partnered China Mobile to introduce a pilot project to providing wireless network access on public buses in Beijing.

Tokyo Metro in April this year also introduced a free Wi-Fi service trial at 30 of its train stations.Commuters are able to enjoy the free Wi-Fi service once they download and register for the company’s mobile app.

When quizzed, the Singapore Mass Rapid Transit (SMRT) told ZDNet Asia that it too is working with local authorities to explore the feasibility of providing Wi-Fi on its train and buses services.

“In tandem with the growth in ridership, we also see a corresponding increase in demand by passengers for more services on the go,” said Jason Chin, information technology director of SMRT.

Access, monetization issues to consider
The growing interest to provide Wi-Fi on public transport may have its benefits, but service providers will know such deployments are not without their challenges, Misra said.

One such challenge is providing wireless access in areas of poor connectivity. The analyst said a train or bus is constantly moving and some of these would go into places with weak to no Wi-Fi signal for a prolonged period of time, particularly in rural areas.

“This scenario is quite likely as many parts of Asia are still not wired up and their IT infrastructure may not be as mature as the U.S. or Europe,” he pointed out.

A possible solution would be to plan the routes with accompanying 3G or 4G network coverage, so users can switch to these options when the Wi-Fi signal is weak, he suggested.

Monetizing the Wi-Fi service is another challenge for service providers looking into deploying Wi-Fi service on public transport, and there are many areas for consideration, Misra said.

For instance, if a transport company decides to make customers pay for Wi-Fi, it has to ensure the connection is strong. It can also offer a hybrid model in which the service is free for a limited period of time, before charging people for their usage, he noted.

Alternatively, if the service provider wants to make the service free, it should consider limiting online activities such as viewing YouTube videos so that bandwidth is more evenly shared among commuters. To decide this, it needs to examine the demographic of its passengers, how developed the country is in terms of smartphone penetration, and what kind of Internet access it wants to offer users, he explained.

“If the appropriate model is not chosen, the transport company may face backlash from consumers on poor customer service and a bad travelling experience,” the analyst said.

Singapore-based commuters who spoke to ZDNet Asia were adamant they would not pay for Wi-Fi on public transport, though.

Student Jasper Tan said he hopes Wi-Fi will be installed as the 3G and 4G signals tend to be “weaker” underground. He did not, however, see the need to pay for Wi-Fi on public transport.

“Singapore already does not charge users for its public Wi-Fi so I don’t see why trains should,” Tan said.

Marketing executive Peggy Lee added Wi-Fi on public transport would be “useful” as her mobile data cap is “rather low” which restricts her usage. “Between paying for better connection or using Wi-Fi free but getting a slower connection, I will pick the latter since I’m rarely on trains and buses for more than an hour,” she said. {…}

Facebook Twitter Email Pinterest Plusone Linkedin Print

How New Jersey Transit Failed Sandy’s Test

Kate Hinds and Andrea Bernstein  |  Transportation Nation

On the weekend before Sandy thundered into New Jersey, transit officials studied a map showing bright green and orange blocks. On the map, the area where most New Jersey Transit trains were being stored showed up as orange – or dry. So keeping the trains in its centrally-located Meadows Maintenance Complex and the nearby Hoboken yards seemed prudent.

And it might have been a good plan. Except the numbers New Jersey Transit used to create the map were wrong.

If officials had entered the right numbers, they would have predicted what actually happened: a storm surge that engulfed hundreds of rail cars, some of them brand new, costing over $120 million in damage and thrusting the system’s passengers into months of frustrating delays.

But the fate of NJ Transit’s trains – over a quarter of the agency’s fleet - didn’t just hang on one set of wrong inputs. It followed years of missed warnings, failures to plan, and lack of coordination under Governor Chris Christie, who has expressed ambivalence about preparing for climate change while repeatedly warning New Jerseyans not to underestimate the dangers of severe storms.

Official response to this blunder has largely stuck to one script: No one could have predicted the severity of the storm, and the yards had never flooded before. But NJ Transit’s miscalculations came even as New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority dived into climate change adaptation preparations. The agency on the east side of the Hudson developed detailed operational plans for extreme weather events, including moving electrical signals from flood-prone subway tunnels – a step that enabled the system to get up and running much faster than predicted. And though the MTA also suffered catastrophic damage during Sandy, only 19 of its 8,000 rail cars were inundated.

A months-long investigation by WNYC/New Jersey Public Radio and The Recordexamined hundreds of pages of internal NJ Transit and MTA documents and hours of testimony, and entailed interviews with transit, weather and climate change experts. That review found a stark contrast in the way the two agencies prepared for — and responded to — climate-change-related weather events, with sharply different results.

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo spoke to his transit chief, Joe Lhota (who has since left the agency to run for mayor of New York), beginning on the Thursday before the storm and “regularly” in the lead-up to the storm, according to an aide. The two men even met accidentally by the mouth of the Battery Tunnel as Sandy was peaking.

“The MTA bounced back faster than any other governmental entity,” Lhota boastedthree months after Sandy in a speech to a New York City business group. Then he noted –- pointedly — that it had taken NJ Transit three months to get up and running again.

The weekend before Sandy rolled in, Gov. Christie and NJ Transit executive director Jim Weinstein did not speak, and the Governor was not involved in the decision to store the trains in a flood zone.

“If I’m making the decisions at that level of specificity, then I’d be under water myself,” Christie told New Jersey Public Radio. Instead, he spoke with his transportation commissioner, James Simpson.

According to emails obtained through the Open Public Records Act, Simpson, who is Weinstein’s boss, had only cursory communications with Weinstein. A spokesman for Simpson said he didn’t have information about the number of times the commissioner communicated with the Governor in the days leading up to the storm.

NJ Transit officials have repeatedly defended the agency’s decision to park the trains in low-lying yards in Hoboken and the Meadowlands.

The Hudson River outside NJ Transit’s Hoboken Terminal/accarino via flickr

“The comparison of the MTA and NJ Transit is akin to comparing apples and oranges,” said John Durso Jr., a spokesman for NJ Transit. “They are two very different public transit agencies – different in scope, different in operations, and different in challenges.”

The MTA is the largest transit agency in the country, and carries seven times the riders of NJ Transit. But NJ Transit is the largest statewide transit agency in the country.

Back in December, Weinstein was called before a State Assembly hearing to explain NJ Transit’s storm preparations.

“I can tell you decisions on where to keep our locomotives were sound, based on all the information we had at the time we had to make that decision, which was midday Sunday,” James Weinstein told the committee. “The facts are the weather models we evaluated at the time had an 80 to 90 percent chance the rail yards would stay dry. Our decisions were informed by the fact that neither of those rail yards had ever flooded. It is entirely wrong to characterize them as flood-prone.”

But that reading has brought derision from weather and climate change experts.

“It just shows they don’t understand A) the hazard and B) the risk,” says Columbia University Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory scientist Klaus Jacob, one of the nation’s premier experts on transit planning for climate change. “The past, particularly when it comes to climate change, is not the guide for the future.” {…}

Facebook Twitter Email Pinterest Plusone Linkedin Print

What Public Transit Data Teaches Us About How People Use a City

Emily Badger  |  The Atlantic Cities

What Public Transit Data Teaches Us About How People Use a City

We’ve highlighted a couple of projects this week developed out of an Urban Data Design Challenge in April that invited designers and developers to visualize data on public transit in three cities, San Francisco, Geneva and Zurich. The other two projects overlay transit data on a picture of a city’s poverty, or animate a playful take on the life of individual bus lines (and the people who ride them) from one day in October. This last project, from Schema Design, looks instead at the patterns we make in whole city-wide communities of commuters.

As the creators, Christian Marc Schmidt and Sergei Larionov, wrote about the three below videos that pulse with the movement of transit ridership:

Ridership is an identifier for how cities are utilized—whether they are centralized, decentralized or have multiple focal points, whether activity concentrates during rush hour as people are entering or leaving the city center(s), or whether activity is spread out over time. As the transit passenger data suggests, Geneva is centralized while Zurich appears to have multiple centers, and activity is concentrated during rush hours. Activity in San Francisco on the other hand is more evenly spread out, both spatially and over the course of the day. These insights are not only useful for city planners and transit authorities, who can get a sense of what areas see high and low ridership and understand what areas are underserved by public transit.

Transit Patterns: San Francisco from Schema Design on Vimeo.

Transit Patterns: Zurich from Schema Design on Vimeo.

Transit Patterns: Geneva from Schema Design on Vimeo. {…}

Facebook Twitter Email Pinterest Plusone Linkedin Print

Nurse’s Notes: Alternative transit has benefits

Kay Biediger  |  The Missoulian

Riding the bus has become one of my most enjoyable habits. As I think about why I ride the bus, the benefits fall into the four categories of physical, emotional, intellectual and spiritual.

Common sense and numerous studies identify both the positive physical and mental benefits of people living in transit-served areas and taking advantage of walking, riding a bike, carpooling or taking the bus. Studies in the American Journal of Health Promotion found that body mass index ratings tend to decline significantly with greater use of mass transportation. The availability of good public transportation, sidewalks and bike paths can increase opportunities for physical activity and thus improve overall health.

Here are a few facts:

• The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate that lack of exercise is responsible for more than 20,000 deaths per year in the United States and contributes to the obesity epidemic. Nearly 66 percent of U.S. adults are overweight.

• An increasingly sedentary, car-focused lifestyle has contributed significantly to heart disease and obesity for millions of Americans, many of whom live in communities where public transportation, walking and biking are not viable options.

• Where public transit is unavailable, cars are used for 80 percent of trips of less than 1 mile.

• When Americans live near good bus or light rail, 42 percent choose to leave the car at home.

• People who use public transit spend a median of 19 minutes daily walking to and from transit stops.

• Nearly half of all Americans do not meet the surgeon general’s recommendation of at least 30 minutes of physical activity daily. Yet nearly 30 percent of public transit users may achieve the recommendation solely by walking to and from transit stops.

• In terms of crash injury rates, public transportation is one of the safest modes of travel available. A bus passenger is five times less likely to experience a non-fatal crash injury and 23 times less likely to die in a crash than a driver or passenger in a personal vehicle.

According to the American Housing Survey, people are more likely to commute to work on foot or by bicycle if they live close to their work, live very close to a grocery or drug store, and have good access to public transportation.

Another aspect to consider is the unhealthy effects of traffic emissions on people with asthma, lung disease and heart disease. Traffic emissions are widely implicated in triggering asthma attacks and impairing lung function. Like obesity, asthma is a major public health problem in the United States. Public transportation in the U.S. helps address global climate change by reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 37 million metric tons annually. Currently, more than 200 million passenger cars and light trucks account for about 50 percent of air pollution nationwide. Public transportation, by reducing traffic congestion and overall fuel consumption by 4.2 billion gallons of gasoline in the U.S. annually, can lessen the vehicle emissions that cause respiratory and other illness.

Lastly, consider the emotional, intellectual and spiritual benefits of public transportation. One has less stress in getting to or from work or the store, the opportunity to make new “bus” friends, read the Missoulian or daydream while looking at our beautiful scenery.

I highly recommend challenging yourself to ride the bus. You never know, you may become addicted!

Kay Biediger is director of rehabilitation services at St. Patrick Hospital. {…}

Facebook Twitter Email Pinterest Plusone Linkedin Print

As transit cuts loom, public tells board: ‘You’re messing with our life’

Steve Maynard  |  The News Tribune


The southbound 402 bus sits at the South Hill Mall Transit Center in Puyallup on Jan. 16, 2011. (JANET JENSEN/Staff photographer file, 2011)

Pierce Transit’s board voted Monday to cut 84 positions, or nearly 10 percent of the agency’s workforce, to prepare for a major service reduction at the end of September.

But it was an upcoming 28-percent cut in annual service hours, set for a final vote next month, that generated heated comments from the public and strong reaction from the board.

Buses and shuttles will run less often and for fewer hours, especially on the weekends.

Commenters said people depend on buses to get to work, the grocery store, the doctor’s office and church.

Nancy Uldrikson, of Tacoma, said evening service cuts will hurt shopping malls and other businesses while stranding bus riders. She supported stretching out the frequency of service so people can catch buses in the evening.

“You really need to look at a bigger picture here,” Uldrikson said.

Greg Dansen, of Federal Way, said Pierce Transit should give priority to elderly and disabled people.

“As a society, we need to look out for these people,” Dansen said.

Cher Norman, of Lakewood, wondered how she’ll get to church and medical appointments.

“You’re messing with our life,” she told the board.

In November, voters rejected a sales tax increase of three-tenths of 1 percent for the second time in less than two years. As a result, Pierce Transit plans to reduce its annual service hours for buses and shuttles from 417,000 to 300,000 starting Sept. 29.

Final board action on the service cut is scheduled for June 10.

Board Vice Chairman Rick Talbert told a crowd of more than 100 people at a public hearing Monday that the failure to win approval for the sales tax increase forced the agency to make cuts.

“I get, understand and appreciate the frustration,” said Talbert, a Pierce County Council member.

Board chairwoman and Tacoma Mayor Marilyn Strickland said the cutbacks affect people who need the services the most and have no other options.

“To sit here and listen to you talk about the cuts, it’s devastating to us,” Strickland said.

Those service cuts will start affecting workers Tuesday, when they will begin to be notified about the fourth round of layoffs since 2008.

This time, 84 of 866 budgeted jobs will be cut. That’s a reduction of about $6 million. Pierce Transit’s budget for 2013 is $129.4 million.

Seventy union positions will be eliminated. Among those, 51 people will be laid off.

Fourteen nonrepresented positions will be cut, including 11 in management.

The total cutback is eight positions fewer than Pierce Transit reported last month. Those jobs were saved because the agency was awarded a $1.1 million state transportation grant, said Pierce Transit spokeswoman Carol Mitchell. {…}

Facebook Twitter Email Pinterest Plusone Linkedin Print

Transportation disparities put many students walking to school on dangerous path

Dave Scott  |  Beacon Journal

Anise Moore had mixed feelings about safety in the rough neighborhood where her kids walk to school.

She sat on her porch one warm spring afternoon, looked at the well-kept homes and nice sidewalks on Howe Street and said it’s not so bad.

“It’s a great neighborhood. It’s a great place to live,” she said. “Everybody is basically family oriented here.”

Then she remembered the shooting a couple of blocks away. There also was a stabbing a while ago. The truck fire. The burglaries. The loose dogs. The broken beer bottles and wine bottles on the sidewalks two blocks away. The winos in the alley a block away. The mentally challenged man who everyone says is harmless walking down the middle of the street talking to himself. The drivers who don’t come to a complete stop at intersections, even when kids are around.

Through all that, she keeps a fairly positive attitude about her neighborhood in the Lane Field area of Akron’s near-west side. But she knows walking to school can be dangerous.

“The biggest problem is abandoned houses,” she said shortly before walking with a reporter to pick up her kids at Helen Arnold school. She pointed out 20 empty homes on the seven-block walk.

The Moore family is an example of how education and transportation options are not equal in Ohio. Bus transportation is seen as essential for charter schools but cost-cutting makes it impractical for many public schoolchildren.

Academically, Akron schools are rated “Continuous Improvement” or what amounts to a C grade. Strapped for funds, the district offers the state minimum for busing. That means students living within two miles of their school must walk.

It’s not the same for students attending charter school or wealthy suburban districts with big tax bases.

State legislators who control funding decided a decade ago that transportation is vital to charter school education, and they put the burden of providing it on public schools that were struggling to meet education standards. As a result, school buses taking neighbor children to lower-rated charter schools often pass Akron students walking to their public schools.

Akron schools Treasurer Jack Pierson saw the problem coming in 2001.

“It’s ludicrous,” he said. “They want us to spend the money we need to spend on our kids and spend it on kids that opt for the charter schools.”

Students started leaving Akron Public Schools for charter schools in 2003. In April 2013, that number had reached 3,242.

Over the years, state funding to maintain that policy did not keep up with inflation, putting the burden increasingly on local taxpayers. Between 2003 and 2011, Ohio’s total cost for school transportation increased 31 percent, but the portion local districts paid went up 39 percent.

The result: 34 percent of Akron-area charter school students were bused in 2011 while only 8.7 percent of Akron Public Schools rode a bus. (The state has not updated figures for 2012 and 2013.)

Costs continue to increase, yet Gov. John Kasich’s budget proposal flat-lined transportation funding. It appears the General Assembly is considering otherwise as the tentative budget passes through the Ohio Senate.

For the Moore family, there is little choice but to walk.

Anise Moore has no car and no one else in her family who could drive. Disabled by a congenital disease, she generates little income.

Busing is not an option. She lives about a half-mile from her kids’ school, too close for busing, according to Akron’s standards.

She could choose a charter school, but many of them are rated lower academically.

But choosing to walk can be dangerous.

Between 2010 and 2012, 52 of the 60 school-age pedestrians who were hit by vehicles during normal school hours in Summit and Portage counties were walking in cities with low school-busing rates: Akron, Barberton or Cuyahoga Falls. That averages out to a vehicle hitting a child in one of those districts once every 11 school days.

Akron also has begun a program to take down as many as 100 traffic signals throughout the city, a move some parents say makes those intersections more dangerous to walkers.

Taking care

Kids call Moore the Whistle Lady.

Her mission is not just for her two children: Kyree, 13, and Kyra, 11. Also tagging along this day were nephews Jacce Taylor, 5, and Michael Mitchell, 6.

And it doesn’t stop there.

“I don’t want somebody’s child not to make it home,” she said. “So I have them walk with me. Sometimes as many as nine or 10.”

They must follow the Whistle Lady’s most important rule: When they are ready to cross a street, they all must stop and wait until she sees the traffic is clear.

That’s when the metal whistle hanging on a lanyard around her neck comes out and produces a tweet that can be heard two blocks away. That means it’s OK to cross.

“I tell my kids, ‘Don’t cross until you see nothing,’ ” she said.

Moore never saw any drug deals in her neighborhood during the two years she has lived there, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t there.

Akron police provide data that are mapped on Raidsonline.com.

Since October 2011, there have been six drug incidents within a half block of the children’s path to school. The map also shows five thefts, two assaults and individual cases of vandalism, disorderly conduct and carrying an open container.

Expand the map to include the area a half-mile within Moore’s home and you find more than 100 incidents each of drugs, assault, vandalism and burglary. There also were 15 weapons violations, 26 aggravated assaults, two cases of sexual assault and one homicide.

The Summit County Sheriff’s Office registry shows 10 sexual offenders living within a mile of her home.

Emphasis on safety

The Whistle Lady can’t fix everything.

As she walked to the school with the reporter, they saw tiny children, probably kindergartners, walking alone. The kids would be negotiating the way home by themselves.

“The main danger, to me, is the kindergartners and first-graders walking to school by themselves,” Moore said. “You never know who’s out lurking, looking at children.”

She often invites kids walking alone to join her group.

After arriving at school, she found her son and the two nephews on the playground. Her daughter was at her station as a Safety Patrol guard.

Kyra, 11, wears a yellow sash and holds a flag and is stationed at driveways near the school. Children gather behind her and are not allowed to cross until she sees it’s safe and raises her flag.

The patrol is part of the Safe Kids Coalition that includes AAA, Akron Children’s Hospital and the police and fire departments. In October, more than a month after school starts, it sponsors the Akron Police Department’s Walk This Way program that includes walking with parents to check for marked crosswalks and telling kids to stay on sidewalks and how to cross the street.

A spokesman for the Akron police said the city can’t afford the more costly Safety Town program that suburban schools use. It includes summer instruction on playgrounds or gymnasiums made to look like toy towns.

The Moore family encounters one crossing guard in the seven-block trek to school. The city employs 135 crossing guards at $16.40 per hour for a total budget of $750,000 for 2013.

Dorothy Chlad, Safety Town’s national president, started with Safety Town in 1964 and knows Akron well. She started her work in Bedford and once started a fledgling program in Akron. It didn’t last long.

She learned a lot about kids over the years.

Chlad said the instructions must be repeated many times in many different ways, and it should be done in the summer, before school starts.

Parents don’t necessarily do it best. {…}

Facebook Twitter Email Pinterest Plusone Linkedin Print

Can green thinking value straight lines?

Jarrett Walker  |  Human Transit

As people who value the durability of human civilization celebrate Earth Day, here’s a question they might think about.

Ecological thinking values localness, smallness, and natural processes.  It talks about place, community, and the Earth as a unit.  These things are all naturally circular.  Everywhere in sustainability thinking is the image of the circle: the cycles of ecological process, the cycles of generations, the natural cycles of the earth at many scales.

So today, if you want to make any activity look durable and ecologically sound, even “cool,” you draw a circular diagram of it.

Susops-carbon-cycle
US Forest Service

But the circle is much more than a diagram of natural process.  The circle is also closure, embrace, inward-lookingness.   It is the essence of all the concentric units by which we define “home”: our families, our households, and our “community” at whatever scales we choose to identify it.  What all those things have in common is that we want a boundary between “inside” and “outside.”  The circle — which has the feature ofenclosing the largest possible area within the smallest possible boundary – is the natural image.

Thus, in the lexicon of Australian Aboriginal art, famous for its extraordinary powers of emotive abstraction, a circle means place.

Yala_Yala_Gibbs_Tjungurrayi

Yala Yala Gibbs Tjungurrayi, Kuninka (Western Quoli) Dreaming at Kaakaratintja, 1987.  Artcurial.com

…which is why Aboriginal art so often reminds us of maps, where the same is often true.  Whatever a place is in reality, our minds think of it as enclosed,  bounded in the most efficient possible way, a circle.

So, in the absence of a strong planning ideology or natural barriers, ancient and medieval cities tend to be more or less round.

6a00d8341d17e553ef01156f3f9eda970c-800wi

… because in addition to minimizing circumference, and hence the cost of fortification, a circle minimizes the average distance between two points within itself.

It is natural that today’s green thinking, obsessed with restoring communities and cycles, thinks in circles.  The stable circular cycle is the model of success.  The successful community feels enclosing in the way that the successful family does.  It hugs you, and nothing is more circular than an embrace.

The green movement, and especially efforts at durable urbanism, knows how to talk about circles of many scales: concentric circles, overlapping circles, all kinds of circularity and enclosure.  Even the notion of downshifting technologically, to simpler systems maintanable by smaller units of organization, evokes circles.  It’s intriguing that in the iconography of tech, the circle has come to mean off, while the straight line means on.

9394909-red-power-switch-in-on-off-position-isolated-macro-closeup

So my question is simple.

  • Can those who value a civilization based on durability,  community, and harmony with natural processes achieve those goals — at any scale — while insisting on circularity as the core metaphor for all forms of success?

… because to do so is to define the straight line as the enemy.

Durable urbanism, and ecological thinking in general, has many enemies that are shaped like straight lines, or at least as paths that will never close into cycles.  Climate change, peak oil, war, exploitation, and pollution are not cyclical, at least not at a scale that’s relevant to human life.  We see them instead as linear processes colliding with larger limits that are themselves linear, shaped like walls: competing armies, starvation, the fixed limits of the earth.

This is the story of my career:  Transportation planners — including those of us who value the goal of a more durable civilization — are in the business of trying to convince circle-lovers of the value of straight lines.  This, I’ve come to believe, is the core of why the conversation is difficult, and why so many people in the urbanist and placemaking professions have trouble reconciling themselves to transport needs, or even claim dominion over them.

Because face it: Transportation is about straight lines.  It begins with the desire to be somewhere other then where you are, in order to do something you want to do, and the basic shape of that human desire is a line from where you are to where you need to be.

So the history of transportation, since the industrial revolution, has been about circular communities and places feeling attacked by the straight lines that any useful form transportation must draw.  In the 1850s, Henry David Thoreau recognized the community-piercing and place-destroying role of railroads as clearly as Jane Jacobs did of freeways a century later.  The transportation technology didn’t matter: what mattered was that something that had to be linear was piercing something that’s naturally round: the place, at any scale.

And so, today, we have an urbanist discourse that is all about somehow taming the straight line, bending it into a circle.  A long strain of urbanism, epitomized by Darrin Nordahl’s work, imagines that transit planning could be based on the tourist experience, even though tourist travel is unlike destination-motivated in this exact respect:  The tourist’s desire really is a circle: the loop shape of the tour.  But all other transport is motivated straight-line desires, the need to be there so that we can do something.

So is the circle always the image of goodness for the ecological way of thought?  And is the straight line always evil? {…}

Facebook Twitter Email Pinterest Plusone Linkedin Print

Mapping the Subtle Science of Parking Demand

Emily Badger  |  The Atlantic Cities

Mapping the Subtle Science of Parking Demand
rightsizeparking.org

In the absence of nuanced data about how people drive and live in different contexts, city regulations and building developers generally assume that people need way more parking than they really do. A new downtown condo winds up with too much parking. A multifamily apartment near a subway stop gets way too much. Even a low-rise suburban development likely doesn’t need quite such a sea of asphalt.

But we overbuild parking because that’s the way we’ve been doing it for years, and because the people who finance new developments fear what sounds like a risky investment: the transit-oriented development with hardly any parking at all.

The alternative isn’t simply to err on the other end of the spectrum; underestimate parking demand, and you wind up with equally real complications (and angry neighbors). So how do cities and developers get this right? How could they treat parking demand as a subtle science – with overlapping variables based on land use, transit access, demographics, jobs, rent pricing – instead of as an assumption?

The King County Metro Transit agency in the Seattle region has been working on this, with the help of the Center for Neighborhood Technology and the Urban Land Institute Northwest. They’ve spent the past year trying to measure exactly which factors dictate residential parking demand around the region, in downtown Seattle, in urban neighborhoods, in the suburbs and even farther out. The result of their efforts is this Right Size Parking Calculator web application that can estimate parking demand down to a single parcel of land (and that should be replicated in other cities):


Right Size Parking

That map is based on a model developed through a painstaking survey of 220 representative multifamily buildings from across the region. Researchers went into each of them to count cars in the middle of the night (peak residential demand, as it’s defined by the industry, occurs between midnight and 5 a.m.).

“On average, we saw what we assumed, which was that parking was overbuilt,” says Daniel Rowe, a transportation planner with the King County Department of Transportation. “Before this project started, we had heard from a lot of different stakeholders in the area that parking was being overbuilt, but we didn’t want to make that assumption. That’s the whole reason we did all this data collection – we wanted to verify it.”

On average, these buildings were supplying about 1.4 parking stalls per housing unit; residents were only using about 1 stall per unit. And that oversupply extended across the region, from the central business district to urban neighborhoods to the suburbs. The project also collected information from each of these buildings on how the parking was priced, how the rental units were priced, and whether those two costs were bundled together. All of that information from this building survey was then used, alongside data on land use, demographics, job locations, and transit to hone a model capable of estimating the parking demand on a given property, accounting for factors like its proximity to transit and the price of parking relative to rent.

A $100 monthly parking fee doesn’t deter parking in a building full of $2,000 a month luxury apartments quite like it does in a complex intended for affordable housing. Unbundle the cost of parking anywhere, and it also looks more expensive than it does when it’s nominally free (but drives up the price of your rent). All of these subtle cues, in addition to the more obvious factors like transit access, influence demand.

The web tool enables developers or curious residents to change the specifications on a particular parcel (adjust the rent, the square footage and the number of units), as well as other characteristics about the neighborhood, and track how parking demand changes as a result.

The idea is that developers might use the tool when planning a project, but also that local governments might consider this data in updating their parking regulations. King Country is agnostic about what they come up with.

“The name ‘Right Size’ is very conscious because we don’t want to just say ‘in all cases there should be less parking,’” says Ron Posthuma, the assistant director of the King County Department of Transportation. “In some cases, maybe there should be more.”

Zoom out on this map to the entire region, and the tool also has the effect of painting larger patterns in parking demand. If the county can update the underlying data in two years, in five years, in 10 years, it may also be able to track how perceptions of parking will inevitably change with time.

“Those macro-scale trends are not surprising to us at all,” Rowe says. “The real power in this model is to be at a parcel level, to be able to show it’s really not ‘urban’ and ‘suburban.’ It’s not that simple. It really matters at a parcel level, what is the transit access in walking distance to that development? What is the pricing scenario?”

What might influence a family of four more than cultural assumptions that they keep two cars in the garage? {…}

Facebook Twitter Email Pinterest Plusone Linkedin Print

Commuting critters: Animals that ride public transportation

Laura Moss  |  Mother Nature Network

Photo: M. Janicki/flickr

As cities expand and habitats are destroyed, conservationists worry about the plight of local wildlife. But adaptable animals — both wild and domestic — are learning tonavigate our cities, and many are even boarding buses and trains to do so.
Here’s a look at some headline-making animal “commuters” from around the world.
Pigeon passengers
In New York, pigeons are known to catch a ride on the city subway, boarding trains at outdoor terminals and exiting at stops farther down the line. Subway workers say the birds are motivated by hunger. They enter in search of food crumbs and unwittingly find themselves riding public transportation.
stray dogs in MoscowRussia’s rail-riding dogs
Moscow’s 35,000 stray dogshave developed many tactics to surviving in the city. They’ve been observed obeying traffic lights, and witnesses say they’re notorious for the “bark-and-grab,” a ploy that involves startling people into dropping their snacks. They also ride the subway.
After a day of scavenging on the streets, the dogs board the train — choosing the quiet carriages at the front and back — and return to the suburbs. Experts say the canines have learned to judge the length of time to spend on the train and even work together to make sure they get off at the right stop.
Scientists believe the strays’ behavior can be traced back to the Soviet Union’s collapse, when Russia’s new capitalists moved industrial complexes to the suburbs.
Pub-frequenting pup
Ratty, a 10-year-old Jack Russell terrier in North Yorkshire, England, became a celebrity in 2006 when the media discovered that he had hopped rides on the local bus. The dog would ride 5 miles to the Black Bull Pub, where he was a welcome regular and he would snack on sausages. Unfortunately, Ratty was hit by a car and killed in 2010 as he sat at the bus stop.
Commuting cats
Casper the Commuting Cat bookEngland certainly seems to have its share of bus-frequenting felines. The first cat to make headlines for riding public transportation was Casper, a rescue who started queuing with people at the bus stop across from his house in 2002. Soon he was taking daily bus rides and curling up in warm seats. His public transportation habit made him a celebrity and a book was even written about his travels called “Casper the Commuting Cat.” Unfortunately, Casper was hit by a car and killed in 2010.
In 2007, a white cat with one blue eye and one green started boarding the Walsall to Wolverhampton bus at the same time each morning and getting off at a stop farther down the road. Drivers nicknamed him “Macavity” and suspected he that he chose his stop because it’s located next to a fish-and-chips stop.
A 15-year-old ginger cat named Dodger made headlines in 2011 for hopping onto buses at the stop behind his U.K. home. He’s such a regular rider that he curls up in commuters’ laps and drivers bring him tins of cat food and remind him to get off at his stop.
Goat on the go
In 2008, a 35-pound goat somehow hitched a ride on a Portland, Ore., bus, and Multnomah County Animal Control took the animal into custody for “lack of proper fare.” The goat’s owners didn’t even realize he was missing until they saw the story on TV.
Coyote commute
That same year, a coyote hopped on the light rail at the Portland airport and got comfortable on a seat. Before the train took off, wildlife specialists were called in to remove the critter.
Monkeys on the metro
In India, monkeys are considered representatives of the Hindu god Hanuman, and tradition dictates that the animals be fed on Tuesdays and Saturdays. Because of this, Delhi’s monkey population has grown to the point that city officials have petitioned the Supreme Court to relieve them of the task of monkey control.
The monkeys, which are often aggressive, have stolen clothes, invaded the prime minister’s office and taken to riding buses and trains. {…}
Facebook Twitter Email Pinterest Plusone Linkedin Print